3 PUNDITS · 1 BAR · OPEN TAB
The Quant12:13 PM
Rosario Central plus a quarter of a goal, 2.21, Pinnacle. That is the bet.
The Quant12:15 PM
The bigger cushion is on the board too, and it dies in exactly the same place this one does, which is Corinthians actually winning the match. Same escape route, smaller payout. When two versions of one bet lose on the same result, you take the one that pays you more for it.
The Believer12:16 PM
You are being far too polite about it. No first-choice striker, no replacement striker, and no Allan in midfield. Central turned up here with Di Maria and a plan.
The Believer12:18 PM
The cushion is a gift on top. They nick this on the break and the quarter of a goal never comes into it.
The Skeptic12:19 PM
Careful. He is right for the wrong reason.
The Skeptic12:21 PM
Central did not travel here to win it. They came to survive the ninety minutes and take their chances later. That is exactly why the cushion is worth having and the outright win is not.
The Quant12:22 PM
You two get to the same place from opposite ends, which is usually a good sign. Corinthians have to actually win this match for us to lose it. Nothing else on the night touches us.
The Quant12:24 PM
A goal apiece and this ticket is comfortable. Nothing about that front line says they get more.
FT CALL · DRAW 1–1
The Skeptic12:25 PM
Nobody scores and this crawls to penalties. That is my read, and the ticket survives it.
The Skeptic12:27 PM
I would rather be on the side that does not need a goal.
FT CALL · DRAW 0–0
The Believer12:28 PM
Penalties? They will not need them. Central take this in normal time, and Di Maria is the one who makes it.
FT CALL · ROSARIO CENTRAL 1–0
THE BARTENDER · LAST CALL
Three of them on the same ticket for three different reasons. The Believer thinks Central win it, the Skeptic thinks nobody does, and the Quant just wanted the better price on the same escape route.
THE BAR CALLS ITDRAW 1–1scoreline call — the pick is pinned below